RESILIENSI BAHASA LAMPUNG DI KALANGAN GENERASI Z: PERAN STRATEGIS PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA LAMPUNG”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34125/jkps.v10i4.1085Keywords:
Resiliensi Bahasa, Bahasa Lampung, Generasi Z, Institusi Pendidikan, Revitalisasi DigitalAbstract
Local languages represent a vital cultural heritage currently facing significant challenges due to globalization and digital transformation. This study aims to analyze the resilience of the Lampung language among Generation Z by examining the strategic role of the Lampung Language Education Study Program as an institutional agent. This research employed a qualitative-descriptive approach using phenomenological methods. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observations, and document analysis, and processed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2019).The findings reveal that Lampung language resilience operates through three main dimensions: individual resilience, digital resilience, and institutional resilience. Generation Z demonstrates a strong ethnolinguistic identity but tends to express it through digital platforms rather than formal interaction. The Lampung Language Education Program plays a crucial role in building a sustainable linguistic ecosystem through curriculum innovation, creative digital activities, and community engagement.This study proposes a new conceptual framework called the Institutional Linguistic Resilience (ILR) Model, which integrates personal, technological, and institutional factors to explain the sustainability of regional languages.
References
Azmi, M. U., Fatimah, A. B., Khomisah, K., & Salsabila, G. N. (2025). Code shift in the digital communication of Generation Z in Indonesia. Educative: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3(2), 65–68. [https://doi.org/10.70437/educative.v3i2.1245](https://doi.org/10.70437/educative.v3i2.1245)
Lestari, N., Sudjarwo, S., & Sinaga, R. M. (2023). Tendency of Lampung language users in adolescents in communicating: A case study in Lampung, Indonesia.International Journal of Research and Review, 10(1), 709–718. [https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230180](https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230180)
Lumbanbatu, I. M. (2024). *Exploring language and ethnic identity among Indonesian Generation Z.Indonesian EFL Journal, 10*(2). [https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v10i2.9945](https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v10i2.9945)
Purwani, E. S., Sukmana, O., & Salviana, V. (2024). The threat of extinction of Lampung regional language, Indonesia: A phenomenological view. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 7(5). [https://doi.org/(see](https://doi.org/%28see) article)
Rusminto, N. E., Ariyani, F., & Setiyadi, A. B. (2022). Local language vs. national language: The Lampung language maintenance in the Indonesian context.Kervan. International Journal of African and Asian Studies.[https://doi.org/10.13135/1825-263X/5787](https://doi.org/10.13135/1825-263X/5787)
Sihite, M. R., & Sibarani, B. (2023). Technology and language revitalization in Indonesia: A literature review of digital tools for preserving endangered languages. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE).[https://doi.org/(see](https://doi.org/%28see) article)
Syaputri, W., Malik, N. J., & Datang, F. A. (2023). Lampungic maintenance in urban areas: The differences based on student’s response.ELT-Lectura, 9(2). [https://doi.org/10.31849/elt-lectura.v9i2.10510](https://doi.org/10.31849/elt-lectura.v9i2.10510)
Wediasti, W., & Hiasa, F. (2024). *Perbedaan eksistensi penggunaan Bahasa Indonesia antara Generasi Milenial dan Generasi Z.* *Jurnal Ilmiah Korpus, 9*(1). [https://doi.org/10.33369/jik.v9i1.40954](https://doi.org/10.33369/jik.v9i1.40954)
Wijaya, M. F., et al. (2025). *NusaAksara: A multimodal and multilingual benchmark for preserving Indonesian indigenous scripts. arXiv.[https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18148](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18148)
Brown, K. (2013). Vitality Theory.Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.[https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.496](https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.496)
Jamallullail, S. H., & Nordin, S. (2023). Ethnolinguistic Vitality Theory The Last Stance for a Language Survival.Sustainable Multilingualism, 22(1), 27–55. [https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2023-0002](https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2023-0002)
Singh, M. (2023). Ethnolinguistic vitality, social identity and inter group relationship in a multilingual contact situation.Mind & Society, 12, 58–64. [https://doi.org/10.56011/mind-mri-122-20237](https://doi.org/10.56011/mind-mri-122-20237)
Haugen, E. (1972). The Ecology of Language.Stanford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620211](https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620211)
Mufwene, S. S. (2022). Globalization and the ecology of language evolution.Journal of Language Contact, 15*(3), 467–489. [https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-15030002](https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-15030002)
Steffensen, S. V., & Fill, A. (2014). *Ecolinguistics: The state of the art and future horizons.Language Sciences, 41,6–25. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003)
Chen, H. (2021). Language choice and identity negotiation in digital communication among youth.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(9), 827–843. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1827647](https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1827647)
Giles, H., & Johnson, P. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance.International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68*(1), 69–99. [https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1987.68.69](https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1987.68.69)
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). *The social identity theory of intergroup behavior.* In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations* (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
Yuliana, N., & Hajar, I. (2023). Digital identity and local language maintenance among Indonesian Generation Z.Asian EFL Journal, 30(2), 112–130. [https://doi.org/10.55535/aeflj.v30i2.219](https://doi.org/10.55535/aeflj.v30i2.219)l
Duarte, J., Gerritsen, N., Lourenço, M., Melo-Pfeifer, S., & Pinto, S. (2024). Service learning for linguistic and cultural diversity in higher education: Proposals for pre-service (language) teacher education.Education Sciences, 14(7), 750. [https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070750](https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070750)
Jiao, S., Wang, J., Ma, X., You, Z., & Jiang, D. (2022). Motivation and its impact on language achievement: Sustainable development of ethnic minority students’ second language learning.Sustainability, 14*(13), 7898. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137898](https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137898)
Pikhart, M., Klimova, B., & Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2024). Exploring university students’ preferences and satisfaction in utilizing digital tools for foreign language learning.* Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1412377. [https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1412377](https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1412377)
Dani, N. A., & Seruji, Z. (2024). *Language vitality among the young generation of a minority ethnic group in Sabah.International Journal of Humanities, Philosophy & Language, 7*(27), 1–18. [https://doi.org/10.35631/IJHPL.728001](https://doi.org/10.35631/IJHPL.728001)
St. Thomas, R. D., & Susanti, A. (2025). Community, education, and technology in language revitalization: A narrative review.Lingua Journal of Linguistics & Language, 3(2), 1039. [https://doi.org/10.61978/lingua.v3i2.1039](https://doi.org/10.61978/lingua.v3i2.1039)
Burgo, C. (2024). Language program vitality in higher education. Bilingual Review/Revista Bilingüe, 36(3), 1–9.
Sitaresmi, N., Astini, M. P., Sulistyaningsih, L. S., & Cahyani, I. (2023). The vitality of mother tongues in a multilingual society in Dieng, Central Java.Jurnal Arbitrer,
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis.NursingPlus Open, 2,8–14.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). *One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18*(3), 328–352.
Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2023). *A hands-on guide to doing content analysis.* *African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13*(1), 1–6.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). *Naturalistic Inquiry.* Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). *Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook* (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Nindrea, R. D., Sari, I. M., & Pramono, A. (2024). *Thematic analysis in health qualitative research: A practical guide.* *Belitung Nursing Journal, 10*(1), 45–54.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). *Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.* *International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16*(1), 1–13.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). *Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches* (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). *Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines.* *International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19,* 1–13. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220](https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220)
