PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TENTANG PEMILIHAN UMUM (STUDI KASUS PADA PEMILIHAN ANGGOTA DPR, DPD DAN DPRD DI SUMATERA BARAT TAHUN 2009)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34125/jkps.v9i2.454Keywords:
Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pemilu, Panwaslu dan Sentra Gakkumdu, BawasluAbstract
The criminal provisions in each law regarding General Elections (Elections) always increase, this is because there are still acts which in previous elections were not regulated as election crimes. The 2004 and 2009 Election Laws regulate procedural law and time limits for enforcing election criminal law. The Chairman of the Indonesian Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu), the Chief of the Indonesian Police and the Attorney General have made a Memorandum of Agreement to form an Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu) which contains elements from the Police, Prosecutor's Office and Election Supervisory Committee (Panwaslu) and is formed at the center, province and districts/cities which aims to effectively handle election crimes in accordance with the principles of justice, namely fast, simple and low cost as well as free, honest and impartial. The enforcement of election criminal law in the 2009 elections should have been more effective, but it turns out that based on Bawaslu's report the enforcement of election criminal law was very ineffective. This can be seen from the 2629 cases of election criminal violations, only 215 of which were decided in court. Referring to this problem, using a sociological juridical (empirical) legal research method, namely research carried out by analyzing data sources and then conducting interviews to reveal what problems occurred, what the coordination pattern actually was carried out by the Panwaslu with the Gakkumdu Center, how the Panwaslu and The Gakkumdu Center follows up on reports/findings of violations of election crimes, to determine whether many cases forwarded by the Panwaslu to the Gakkumdu Center are declared not to be election crimes, or there is not enough evidence, or the time for resolving election crimes will exceed the time limit, as well as looking for any factors which is an obstacle for both Panwaslu and the Gakkumdu Center in enforcing the law for election crime violations. From the research results, it turns out that coordination between the Panwaslu and the Gakkumdu Center went well, but enforcement of the criminal law for the election of members of the DPR, DPD and DPRD in 2009 failed, this was because reports submitted to the Panwaslu were reviewed and then submitted to the Gakkumdu Center to be reviewed again before being forwarded. to investigators. In the end, the Gakkumdu Center is no longer a forum for speeding up the resolution of handling election crimes, instead it acts as a filter for cases that will be passed on to the trial stage. Apart from that, there is a problem of differences in perception between who has the authority to declare suspected criminal acts, whether the Panwaslu or the Police, and then there is a shifting of duties between each other. for collecting evidence between Investigators and Panwaslu, and it cannot be denied that the quality of Panwaslu's human resources is very limited, most recently due to time restrictions for enforcing election criminal law as regulated in the law on elections. Therefore, it would be better if the law on elections strengthens the position of the Gakkumdu Center as the central institution for reporting and enforcing election criminal law, no longer the Panwaslu.
References
Adnan Buyung Nasution, “ Aspirasi Pemerintahan Konstitusional di Indonesia, Studi Sosio-Legal atas Konstituante 1956-1959”PT. Pustaka Utama Grafiti, Jakarta 2001
A.Mansyhur Effendi, Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Hukum Nasional dan Internasional, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta
Alexander Irwan dan Edriana, Pemilu : Pelanggaran Asas Luber .1995.
Ansorie Sabuan, Ansorie ; Syarifuddin Pattanase, and Ruben Achmad, Hukum Acara Pidana, (1990)
Amirudin dan Zainal Asikin, 2004, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT Raja Grafindo, Jakarta
Bambang Sunggono, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Suatu Pengantar), PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta
Barda Nawawi Arif, Kebijakan Legislatif dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan dengan Pidana Penjara, Balai Penerbitan Undip, Semarang, 1996.
_________________Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Kajian Perbandingan, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung 2005.
Darji Darmodiharjo & Shidarta, Pokok Pokok Filasat Hukum, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta 1999
Djoko Prakoso, Tindak Pidana Pemilu, Rajawali Pers, 1987.
E. Utrech, Pengantar Dalam Hukum Indonesia, Penerbit Universitas,Jakarta 1966
Fran Magnis Suseno, “Etika Politik” Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Kenegaraan Modern, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2003
International IDEA, (2002) and International IDEA, Kerangka Hukum Pemilu Indonesia Tahun 2004 [Legal Framework of the Indonesian 2004 General Election], Jakarta: IDEA, 2004.
International IDEA, International Electoral Standards, Guidelines for Reviewing the Legal Framework of Elections, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, 2002
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Menuju Negara Hukum yang Demokratis, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2008
Komisi Pemilihan Umum, Laporan Penyelenggaraan Pemilu di Indonesia. Komisi Pemilihan Umum 2004
Leden Marpaung, Unsur-unsur Perbuatan Yang Dapat Dihukum, (Delik), Jakarta, SinarGrafika, 1991
M.Sudradjat Bassar, Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu, Remadja Karya Offset, Bandung, 1983
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rieneka Cipta, Jakarta 1993
Muladi, Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana Cetakan Kedua, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2004
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1984
Nazarudin, Sjamsuddin, Dinamika Sistem Politik Indonesia, Gramedia: Jakarta, 1993
Panitia Panwaslu 2004, Laporan Pengawasan Pemilu 2004
Ramlan Surbakti dkk., Perekayasaan Sistem Pemilihan Umum, Untuk Pembangunan Tata Politik Demokratis, Kemitran bagi pembaharuan tata pemerintahan di Indonesia, 2008
Robert A. Dahl, Demokrasi dan Para Pengkritiknya, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 1992
Salim, Perkembangan Teori dalam Ilmu Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2010
Samego Indria , Book Review Ekonomi Politik, Pasca Sarjana Ilmu Politik, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta. 2000
Samuel P Hutington, the third wave : Democratization in the late twentieth century, Norman, OK, University of Oklahoma Press
Satochid Kartanegara., Hukum Pidana, Tanpa Tempat, Balai Lektur Mahasiswa, Tanpa Tahun.
Sintong Silaban, Tindak Pidana Pemilu Suatu Tinjauan Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Pelaksanaan Pemilu Yang Jujur dan Adil¸ Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta 1992.
Soetandya Wignyosubroto, Hukum : Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya. Elsam-Huma, Jakarta 2002
Sudarto, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1981
_______, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana I , Alumni, Bandung, 1986
Sudikno Mertokusumo dan A. Pitlo, Bab-Bab tentang Penemuan Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Yogyakarta, 1993
Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2010
Tim Peneliti Perludem, Efektivitas Panwas: Evaluasi Pengawasan Pemilu 2004 Disertai Resume Pengawasan Pemilu 2004, Jakarta 2004
Topo Santoso., Tindak Pidana Pemilu, Sinar Grafika, 2006
¬¬¬_________________ Penegakan Hukum Pemilu : Praktik Pemilu Tahun 2004, Kajian Pemilu 2009-2014
United Nations Centre for Human Rights. Professional Training Series No. 2, Human Rights and Elections: A Handbook on the Legal, Technical and Human Rights Aspects of Elections, New York and Geneva: United Nations, 1994
Yoserwan, Problematik Aturan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemilu Anggota DPR, DPD dan DPRD, Jurnal Konstitusi PUSaKO Univ Andalas, vol II, No 1 Juni 2009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Kepemimpinan dan Pengurusan Sekolah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.