PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF THE USE OF EDLINK AND SIAKAD LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AS THE BASIS FOR DEVELOPING A MOODLE- AND GATHER.TOWN-BASED LMS FOR CIVIC EDUCATION

Authors

  • Desi Mardianti Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Intan Kusumawati Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Rina Febriana Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Sukaji Sukaji Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Faris Hazmi Qaedi Zihni Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Herlina Dartin Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v10i3.1315

Keywords:

Literasi Digital, Learning Management System, EdLink, SIAKAD, Evaluasi Awal

Abstract

Online learning requires the utilization of Learning Management Systems (LMS) that are not only administratively functional but also support the enhancement of students’ digital literacy. This study aims to evaluate the use of existing LMS platforms, namely EdLink and SIAKAD, as the foundation for the subsequent design and development of a Civic Education LMS. A mixed-methods descriptive approach within the initial stages of a Research and Development (R&D) model was employed. Data were collected through questionnaires administered to 20 students and in depth interviews with 4 students focusing on accessibility, interactivity, user interface design, and instructional support. The evaluation results indicate that, overall, EdLink and SIAKAD scored highly in terms of accessibility and administrative management but remain limited in discussion forum interactivity, notification quality, and interface design. These findings highlight the need for designing a more adaptive and interactive Civic Education LMS integrating gamification and artificial intelligence features. This research serves as a preliminary foundation for subsequent expert validation and student trials in the development of the new LMS.

References

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2021). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: A unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 46(7), 1384–1402. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1630816

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2023). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Student experiences and learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 195, 104674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104674

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Chou, S. W., Chen, W. Y., & Lin, C. Y. (2022). Designing learner-centered learning management systems to enhance engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(6), 1094–1112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1703011

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.28945/1621

Ge, X., Chen, B., & Chen, X. (2025). SRLAgent: Enhancing self-regulated learning in adaptive learning systems with artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04567. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.04567

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Kayyali, M. (2024). Digital literacy as a 21st-century competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning and Education, 4(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44277-023-00057-4

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2022). Indeks literasi digital Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: Kominfo. https://literasidigital.id

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Laporan Indeks Literasi Digital Nasional 2023. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.

Khaldi, M., Jemmali, M., & Aljuaid, N. M. (2023). Gamification in e-learning environments: A systematic review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1735–1760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11234-5

Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2023). Exploring students’ perspectives on learning management systems: Usability, engagement, and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 563–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11234-7

Khalil, M., Almalki, A., & Petersen, S. A. (2023). Gamification in learning management systems: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6421–6450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11676-3

Khalil, M., Ebner, M., & Chen, N.-S. (2023). Gamification in learning management systems: A systematic review of recent empirical studies. Computers & Education, 197, 104704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104704

Kominfo. (2023). Indeks Literasi Digital Indonesia 2023. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. https://literasidigital.id

Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2023). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Elements of award-winning online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 56, 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100870

Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2022). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies for online teaching success. The Internet and Higher Education, 53, 100852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100852

Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009

Molenda, M. (2015). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 54(2), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21461

Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Nguyen, T. T., & Pham, T. (2022). Learning management systems in higher education: Pedagogical opportunities and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3679–3697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10771-5

OECD. (2024). Digital education outlook 2024: Strengthening skills for the 21st century. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/xxxx

OECD. (2024). OECD digital education outlook 2024: Paving the way for future-ready learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/digedu-outlook-2024

Park, S., Han, S., & Kim, J. (2022). Exploring virtual campus spaces for online learning: The case of Gather.Town integration. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1487–1505. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1920432

Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self-efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning and e-exams. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001

Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2019). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.3431

Song, Y., Sun, D., & Wang, X. (2023). Building community in virtual learning environments: Effects of immersive spaces on student engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(6), 1521–1538. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13327

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. Paris: UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/reports/gem-report/2023

Western Governors University. (2023). Digital literacy and online learning survey. Salt Lake City: WGU Research. Retrieved from https://www.wgu.edu

Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. (2023). Integrating gamification and collaborative virtual environments into learning management systems to improve engagement and learning outcomes. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2170205

Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023). Effects of gamified and personalized learning management systems on students’ motivation and engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11731–11755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11677-3

Yilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023). Effects of user experience and motivation on learners’ satisfaction with learning management systems. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2021-0087

Zheng, L., Chen, G., & Huang, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence-supported adaptive learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10297-9

Zheng, L., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2024). Towards intelligent learning management systems: Student engagement, AI, and digital pedagogy. Computers in Human Behavior, 152, 107236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107236

Zheng, Z., Wang, J., & Li, X. (2024). Artificial intelligence in adaptive learning systems: Enhancing personalization and digital literacy in higher education. Computers & Education, 205, 104890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104890

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Mardianti, D., Kusumawati, I., Febriana, R., Sukaji, S., Zihni, F. H. Q., & Dartin, H. (2025). PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF THE USE OF EDLINK AND SIAKAD LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AS THE BASIS FOR DEVELOPING A MOODLE- AND GATHER.TOWN-BASED LMS FOR CIVIC EDUCATION . Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(3), 1754–1764. https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v10i3.1315