Publication Ethics

This is an ethical statement for the Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan published by the STKIP Pesisir Selatan Institute for Research and Community Service. This statement was adapted from the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and includes a code of conduct for editor-in-chief, members of the editorial board, reviewers and authors. This statement is based on: COPE
The articles published in the Journal of Education Management are important building blocks in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network about education and they are a direct reflection of the quality of the authors and the institution. It is therefore important to agree on standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers and the public. The Editor of the Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan is committed to ensuring that all procedures are directed only to facilitate objective and intellectual treatment. Furthermore, editors and reviewers evaluate manuscripts without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, nationality, or political and group interests. A software is used to avoid plagiarism between articles.
Author assignment
1. Have a responsibility to ensure only new and original works are submitted. (does not contain plagiarism)
    2. May not reproduce work that has been previously published in other journals.
    3. It is not permitted to submit any article under review or consideration by a journal to another journal at the same time.
    4. Only allowed to publish their work elsewhere after receiving an official rejection from the journal or if their request to withdraw their work is officially accepted by the journal.
    5. Must notify the Editor-in-Chief or publisher of data inaccuracies in their published work so that corrections or retraction of articles can be made.
    6. Must make a significant contribution and take responsibility for any deficiencies in their work.
Reviewer Tasks
    1. Must express competing interest before agreeing to review submissions.
    2. May refuse to review any submission due to conflict of interest or insufficient knowledge.
    3. Review all submissions objectively, fairly and professionally.
    4. Disclosing ethical errors encountered during review to the Chief Editor for further action.
    5. Must ensure the authenticity of a submission and be alert to any plagiarism and excessive publication.
    6. Do not discuss post content without permission.
    7. dhere to the time allotted for the review process. Requests for extension to review submissions are at the discretion of the Chief Editor.
Duties of Editorial Board Members
    1. Actively contribute to the development and well-being of the journal.
    2. Act as a journal ambassador.
    3. Continue to support and promote the journal.
    4. Review any work assigned to them.
Editor in Chief Duties
    1. Evaluate manuscripts fairly and solely on their intellectual merit.
    2. Ensure the confidentiality of the manuscript and do not disclose information regarding the manuscript to anyone other than those involved in the publishing process.
    3. Have responsibility for deciding when and which articles to publish.
    4. Actively seek the views of board members, reviewers and authors on how to enhance/enhance the image and visibility of the journal.
    5. Provide clear instructions to potential contributors on the submission process and what is expected of authors.
    6. Ensure proper reviewers are selected/identified for the review process.