EVALUASI PROGRAM ARPISAN ROSAKTI SEBAGAI STRATEGI MBS MELALUI MODEL CONTEXT, INPUT, PROCESS, PRODUCT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v11i2.1432Keywords:
Evaluasi, Model CIPP, Manajemen Berbasis SekolahAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the Arsipan Rosakti program (Pisangcandi Sadar, Aktif, Kreatif, Terapkan IT) as strategy for implementing School Based Management (SBM) at SDN PISANGCANDI 2 using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. This evaluation was conducted to obtain a comprehensive picture of the program's suitability to school needs, resource readiness, implementation process and the program’s impact on educational quality. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study type. Research subjects included the principal and public relations staff. Data collection techniques were carried out through interviews and documentation. Data analysis was carried out based on the four components of the CIPP model, which include context, input, process and product. The results of the study indicate that the Arpisan Rosakti program is relevant to the needs of schools in facing the era of digital transformations. In terms of input, schools are supported by human resources, School Operational Assistance (BOS) funding, and IT facilities, which are managed in stages. The program implementation process is structured through learning supervision, activity reporting and routine evaluation. In terms of product, the program has a positive impact on improving teachers digital competence and students engagement and creativity. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of the digital transformation based SBM program in elementary schools using the CIPP model, which has been understudied for a limited time. This model can serve as a practical reference for developing school innovations. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the CIPP model in comprehensively assessing and developing programs.
References
Anwar, K. (2021). Urgensi evaluasi dalam proses pembelajaran. Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pencerahan, 17(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/rf.v17i1.4183
Andriani, A. D., Mulyana, A., Widarnandana, I. G. D., Armunanto, A., Sumiati, I., Susanti, L., ... & Dewi, I. C. (2022). Manajemen sumber daya manusia (Vol. 1). TOHAR MEDIA. https://share.google/BdpBDPuShAtpItNio
Basaran, M., Dursun, B., Gur Dortok, H. D., & Yilmaz, G. (2021). Evaluation of preschool education program according to CIPP model. Pedagogical Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/9701
Abdilah, A. J. (2025). Evaluasi Kurikulum Bahasa Arab dengan Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product). Risenologi, 10(1), 52-68. https://doi.org/10.21009/risenologi.101.06
Daryanto, (2005). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta
Daryanto, (2012). Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. https://doi.org/10.62159/ghaitsa.v5i3.168
Doyok, R. (2022). Model evaluasi CIPP dalam mengevaluasi program tahfiz selama daring di SMP Islam Al-Ishlah Bukittinggi. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, 8(2), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.32884/ideas.v7i3.429
Fahruddin, F. (2020). Evaluasi program pembelajaran sejarah menggunakan model Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP). Historia: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(2), 199–211.http://doi.org/10.24127/hj.v8i2.2325
Fuadi, A. S., & Anas, M. (2019). Implementasi model CIPP dalam evaluasi Kurikulum 2013 pendidikan ekonomi. Prosiding SEMDIKJAR (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran),316–324. http://ojs.semdikjar.fkip.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/SEMDIKJAR/article/view/32/30
Hadi, A. F., Az-Zahra, F., & Salsabila, N. (2023). Strategi organisasi pendidikan di tingkat sekolah menengah dalam menghadapi tantangan global. Protasis: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya, 2(1), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.55606/protasis.v2i1.87
Jalal, F., & Supriadi, D. (2001). Reformasi pendidikan dalam konteks otonomi daerah. Yogyakarta: Adicita Karya. https://lccn.loc.gov/2001356890
Kim, O.-J. (2019). A study on the measures for managing the quality of curriculum of early childhood education department in college with the application of CIPP model based on PDCA. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(1), 215–226.
Kurniawati, E. W. (2021). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Perspektif Model CIPP(Context, Input, Process, Product). GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal, 2(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.62159/ghaitsa.v5i3.168
Madaus, George F., 1983. Michael S. Scriven, dan Daniel L. Stufflebeam. Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing. DOI: 001: 10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7
Maryati, R., Sukmawati, S., & Radiana, U. (2023). Evaluasi Program Sekolah Penggerak Menggunakan Model Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) di SMA Negeri 5 Sungai Raya Kabupaten Kubu Raya. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(5), 238-249. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/4852
Maulidin, S., & Lukitasari, D. (2024). Manajemen mutu pendidikan dalam meningkatkan prestasi sekolah. ACTION: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Sekolah, 4(3), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.51878/action.v4i3.4268
Myers, D., & Stonehill, R. (1993). School based management. Office of Research Education: Consumer Guide. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED353688
Rizkita, K., & Supriyanto, A. (2020). Komparasi Kepemimpinan Pendidikan di Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam Upaya Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v8i1.32362
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Publications. https://share.google/SWIUET9qcvz2HTd4u
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007). CIPP evaluation model checklist. https://share.google/x6RDtmDbZCwvtOTCN
Sumarsono, R. B. (2019). Upaya mewujudkan mutu pendidikan melalui partisipasi orangtua siswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 24(2), 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um048v24i2p63-74
Sumarsono, R. B., Benty, D. D. N., Wiyono, B. B., Maisyaroh, M., & Supriyanto, A. (2017). Implementasi Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Sekolah. Abdimas Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 70-76. https://doi.org/10.17977/um050v1i12017p70-76
Sumarsono, R. B., Imron, A., Wiyono, B. B., & Arifin, I. (2016). Parents' Participation in Improving the Quality of Elementary School in the City of Malang, East Java, Indonesia. International Education Studies, 9(10), 256-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n10p256
Timan, A., Mustiningsih, & Imron, A. (2022). Digital Leadership Kepala Sekolah Hubungannya dengan Kinerja Guru dan Kompetensi Siswa Era Abad 21. JAMP: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(4), 323–333. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jamp/
Utami, K. P., Isfarudi, I., & Sapriati, A. (2025). Evaluasi Program Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru melalui Kelompok Kerja Guru dengan Model CIPP di Gugus Ki Hajar Dewantara Kecamatan Beji Kota Depok. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 8(2), 643-660. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.8.2.2025.5892
Ulfatin, N., Mustiningsih, M., Sumarsono, R. B., & Yunus, J. N. (2020). School-based management in marginal areas: Satisfying the political context and student needs. Management in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620959739
