MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BLENDED/HYBRID UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN PRAKTIK DI TVET: STUDI LITERATUR SISTEMATIS

Authors

  • Hirval Hirval Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Yusma Elda Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Sovandi Marwan Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Nizwardi Jalinus Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Anwar Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v10i4.1528

Keywords:

Pembelajaran blended, Pembelajaran hybrid, TVET, Keterampilan praktik, Studi literatur sistematis, Pendidikan kejuruan

Abstract

Objective: Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) plays a crucial role in developing practical skills aligned with industry needs. However, practical learning in TVET often faces challenges such as limited facilities, high operational costs, and a gap between curricula and workplace standards. In the context of digital transformation, blended and hybrid learning models have emerged as innovative solutions that integrate online and face-to-face instruction to strengthen practical skill acquisition. This study systematically synthesizes the application of blended/hybrid learning models in TVET, focusing on identifying the models used, their impact on practical skills, and key implementation factors. Following the PRISMA framework, the review analyzes literature from Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar published between 2014 and 2024. Findings show that models such as flipped classroom, rotation model, and enriched virtual model have been variably implemented across global TVET institutions. Blended/hybrid learning has proven effective in enhancing learners’ practical skills—including procedural accuracy, work quality, and workplace safety—provided it is supported by well-structured pedagogical design, adequate digital infrastructure, educator readiness, and strong industry partnerships.

References

UNESCO. Technical and vocational education and training for the future. Paris: UNESCO; 2019.

OECD. Skills beyond school: synthesis report. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2014.

Billet S. Vocational education: purposes, traditions and prospects. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011.

Pavlova M. Technology and vocational education for sustainable development. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009.

Rauner F, Maclean R. Handbook of technical and vocational education and training research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008.

Tripney J, Hombrados JG, Newman M, et al. Technical and vocational education and training (TVET) interventions to improve employment and earnings of young people. Campbell Syst Rev. 2013;9(1):1–171.

Schwab K. The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2016.

Bond M, Bedenlier S, Marín VI, Händel M. Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18(1):1–24.

Graham CR. Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. In: Bonk CJ, Graham CR, editors. Handbook of blended learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer; 2006. p. 3–21.

Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Baki M. The effectiveness of online and blended learning: a meta-analysis. Teach Coll Rec. 2013;115(3):1–47.

Alammary A, Sheard J, Carbone A. Blended learning in higher education: three different design approaches. Australas J Educ Technol. 2014;30(4):440–54.

Hrastinski S. What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends. 2019;63(5):564–9.

Rasheed RA, Kamsin A, Abdullah NA. Challenges in the online component of blended learning. Comput Educ. 2020;144:103701.

Linder KE, Hayes C. High-impact practices in online education. J Online Learn Teach. 2018;14(1):1–12.

Billet S. Vocational education: purposes, traditions and prospects. Springer; 2011.

UNESCO. Revisiting global trends in TVET. Paris: UNESCO; 2018.

OECD. Skills for jobs. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.

Pavlova M. Technology and vocational education for sustainable development. Springer; 2009.

Mulder M. Competence-based vocational and professional education. Springer Int Handb Educ. 2017;23:107–26.

Gonczi A. Competency-based education and training: a world perspective. Educ Res Perspect. 1994;21(1):1–14.

Kolb DA. Experiential learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1984.

Prince M. Does active learning work? J Eng Educ. 2004;93(3):223–31.

Hrastinski S. What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends. 2019;63(5):564–9.

Graham CR. Blended learning systems. In: Handbook of blended learning. Pfeiffer; 2006.

Beatty BJ. Hybrid-flexible course design. EdTech Books; 2019.

Horn MB, Staker H. Blended: using disruptive innovation to improve schools. Jossey-Bass; 2014.

Alammary A, Sheard J, Carbone A. Blended learning design approaches. Australas J Educ Technol. 2014;30(4):440–54.

Bishop JL, Verleger MA. The flipped classroom. ASEE Conf Proc. 2013.

Staker H, Horn MB. Classifying K–12 blended learning. Innosight Institute; 2012.

Watson J. Blended learning models. North Am Counc Online Learn; 2008.

Rauner F, Maclean R. Handbook of TVET research. Springer; 2008.

Eraut M. Developing professional knowledge. Teach Teach Educ. 1994;10(1):1–18.

Boud D, Molloy E. Assessment in education. Routledge; 2013.

ILO. Global framework on core skills for lifelong learning. Geneva: ILO; 2020.

OECD. Education at a glance. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2022.

Yorke M. Employability in higher education. High Educ Acad; 2006.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Hirval, H., Elda, Y., Marwan, S., Jalinus, N., & Anwar, M. (2025). MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BLENDED/HYBRID UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN PRAKTIK DI TVET: STUDI LITERATUR SISTEMATIS. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(4), 3215–3224. https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v10i4.1528