DESAIN ORGANISASI PEMBELAJARAN, KEPUASAN, DAN KINERJA MELALUI KESEJAHTERAAN, INOVASI, DAN KOMITMEN GURU ASN DAN NON-ASN: STUDI PADA SEKOLAH MENENGAH DI KOTA JAMBI (PENDEKATAN STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v11i1.1684Keywords:
Organisasi Pembelajaran, Komitmen Guru, Inovasi, Kinerja GuruAbstract
This study examines the impact of organizational learning design on teacher performance and job satisfaction in secondary schools, focusing on well-being, innovation, and commitment as mediating factors. Using a quantitative survey method, data were collected from 367 S1-certified teachers in Jambi City, Indonesia. The survey included 54 items adapted from established scales related to organizational learning, teacher satisfaction, commitment, innovation, performance, and well-being. Data analysis was conducted using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings indicate that organizational learning design significantly influences teacher commitment and well-being, both of which positively affect job satisfaction and performance. However, the effect of innovation on performance was non-significant, suggesting a need for more targeted strategies to integrate innovation into teaching practices. These results emphasize the importance of a supportive organizational learning environment to enhance teacher engagement and effectiveness. Recommendations are offered for educational policymakers to bolster teacher well-being and commitment through organizational learning initiatives.
References
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reis, 77/78, 345. https://doi.org/10.2307/40183951
Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (Eds.). (2000). Culture and Subjective Well-Being. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2242.001.0001
Drumm, S., Bradley, C., & Moriarty, F. (2022). “More of an art than a science”? The development, design and mechanics of the Delphi Technique. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18(1), 2230–2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.027
Gil, A. J., Carrrillo, F. J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Assessing a learning organization model: A teacher’s perspective. Management in Education, 33(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020618783815
Gil, A. J., Rodrigo-Moya, B., & Morcillo-Bellido, J. (2018). The effect of leadership in the development of innovation capacity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(6), 694–711. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2017-0399
Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
Herzberg, F. (1965). The Motivation to Work. John Wiley & Sons.
Khuzainey, A., et al. (2020). Pengaruh Pendidikan Kewirausahaan, Literasi Digital, Efikasi Diri, dan Inovasi Terhadap Niat Berwirausaha. Indonesian Educational Administration and Leadership Journal, 3(2), 1–16. https://mail.online-journal.unja.ac.id/IDEAL/article/view/28200
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., De Vet, H. C., & Van Der Beek, A. J. (2014). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(3), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000113
Liu, J., Zhang, X., & Jiang, J. (2021). How teachers’ work engagement influences job satisfaction: The mediating role of organizational commitment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 712243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712243
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
Nuraida, R. M. I. K. R., Pakpahan, V. E. A. P., Sari, N. L. A. N. I. S., & Supita, I. (2020). Pengaruh Pendidikan Kewirausahaan, Literasi Digital, Efikasi Diri, dan Inovasi Terhadap Niat Berwirausaha. Indonesian Educational Administration and Leadership Journal, 3(2), 1–16. https://mail.online-journal.unja.ac.id/IDEAL/article/view/28200
Pradhan, R. K., & Hati, L. (2022). The measurement of employee well-being: Development and validation of a scale. Global Business Review, 23(2), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919859101
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion Networks. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195159509.003.0011
Rogers, E. M., & Rahim, S. A. (1976). Where are we in understanding the diffusion of innovations? In Communication and Change (pp. 204–225). University of Hawaii Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824887100-012
Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772395
Senge, P. (1994). The Fifth Discipline Handbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization. Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.
Thien, L. M., Razak, N. A., & Ramayah, T. (2014). Validating teacher commitment scale using a Malaysian sample. SAGE Open, 4(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014536744
