ANALISIS SISTEM PENJAMINAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN (SPMI DAN SPME) DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEBIJAKAN EVALUASI DAN MONITORING PENDIDIKAN DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v11i3.2101Keywords:
SPMI, SPME, Penjaminan Mutu, Akreditasi, school self-evaluationAbstract
Objective: This article analyzes the relationship between the Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) and the External Quality Assurance System (SPME) within Indonesia’s education evaluation and monitoring policy. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA 2020 framework. Articles were searched in ERIC and Scopus with keywords related to internal quality assurance, external quality assurance, school self-evaluation, inspection, accreditation, governance, and Indonesian education. From 100 initial records, 10 studies were included after identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and final selection. Data were analyzed through thematic synthesis. Results: The review produced four major themes: self-evaluation as the foundation of internal quality improvement, inspection and accreditation as external accountability instruments, the complementary relationship between SPMI and SPME, and implementation challenges in Indonesia’s institutional settings. Novelty: This study highlights that educational quality assurance should not be treated only as administrative compliance. Effective quality policy requires the integration of internal reflection and external verification into a continuous quality improvement cycle supported by data use, institutional capacity, stakeholder participation, contextual leadership, and sustainable improvement-oriented monitoring.
References
Afriliandhi, C., & Hasanah, E. (2022). A qualitative study of Indonesian teacher’s perspective about school accreditation. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.13
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chapman, C., & Sammons, P. (2013). School self-evaluation for school improvement: What works and why? CfBT Education Trust.
Figueiredo, C., Sampaio, M., Marinho, P., Dihl Moraes, A., & Fernandes, P. (2024). School self-evaluation in decision making: Perspectives from Portuguese school leaders. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121275
Gardezi, S. (2024). The development and status of self-evaluation as a component of school inspection and quality assurance: A comparison across four countries. Heliyon, 10(20), e39321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39321
Gustafsson, J.-E., Ehren, M. C. M., Conyngham, G., McNamara, G., Altrichter, H., & O’Hara, J. (2015). From inspection to quality: Ways in which school inspection influences change in schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.07.002
Hofer, S. I., Holzberger, D., & Reiss, K. (2020). Evaluating school inspection effectiveness: A systematic research synthesis on 30 years of international research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 100864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100864
Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
Ngo, J., & Meek, V. L. (2019). Higher education governance and reforms in Indonesia: Are the matrices of autonomy appropriate? Journal of International and Comparative Education, 8(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.14425/jice.2019.8.1.17
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Penninckx, M. (2017). Effects and side effects of school inspections: A general framework. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 52, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.06.006
Sayidah, N., Ady, S. U., Supriyati, J., Sutarmin, S., Winedar, M., Mulyaningtyas, A., & Assagaf, A. (2019). Quality and university governance in Indonesia. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(4), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n4p10
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
