KAJIAN KRITIK METODOLOGIS: KONSEP CINTA DAN POLA HUBUNGAN GURU-MURID PERSPEKTIF KAHLIL GIBRAN DALAM TINJAUAN PAI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v11i3.2595Keywords:
konsep cinta, relasi guru-murid, Kahlil Gibran, Pendidikan Agama Islam, kritik metodologisAbstract
This study aims to critically examine the concept of love and teacher–student relationship patterns from the perspective of Kahlil Gibran and analyze their relevance within Islamic Religious Education (PAI). This study is motivated by the growing need to develop pedagogical relationships that extend beyond knowledge transmission to encompass character formation, human values, and students’ spiritual development. Methods: This research employed a qualitative approach using a library research method. Data were collected from Kahlil Gibran’s major works and supported by contemporary literature on Islamic education. The analysis was conducted through a methodological critique approach, focusing on epistemological and pedagogical dimensions. Results: The findings reveal that Gibran’s concept of love emphasizes freedom, autonomy, respect for individual potential, and spiritual growth. This concept gives rise to a dialogical, humanistic, and non-authoritarian teacher–student relationship, fostering a more participatory learning environment. However, from the perspective of Islamic Religious Education, this concept requires reconstruction because it tends to reflect a humanistic-individualistic orientation without a sufficiently strong theological foundation. Furthermore, the proposed teacher–student relationship pattern may weaken the educator’s role as a moral and spiritual guide if implemented without a clear Islamic value framework. Novelty: This study offers a methodological critique that integrates literary-philosophical thought with the epistemology of Islamic education and proposes a love-based pedagogical model grounded in tauhid (Islamic monotheism). This model combines humanistic, dialogical, and spiritual values as the foundation for developing teacher–student relationships in Islamic Religious Education.
References
Alquran:
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. 2014. Alquran dan Terjemahnya. Jakarta: PT. Pantja Cemerlang.
Buku:
Al-Ghazali. (2010). Ihya Ulumuddin. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Bush, T. (2011). Theories of educational leadership and management (4th ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288294
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.
Gibran, K. (2008). The prophet. Alfred A. Knopf.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Nata, A. (2012). Ilmu pendidikan Islam. Kencana.
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2012). Perubahan sosial dan pendidikan. Rineka Cipta.
Artikel dalam jurnal:
Alam, A. (2022). Humanistic education and sustainable development: A review. Education Sciences, 12(5), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050345
Alqahtani, N. (2020). Teacher–student relationships and learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101531
Anwar, M., & Abdullah, A. (2021). Islamic education and character building. Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 9(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.15642/jies.2021.9.2.123-140
Arifin, Z. (2018). Pendidikan Islam dalam perspektif humanistik. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v4i2
Aslan, A. (2019). Emotional intelligence and learning. Educational Review, 71(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1546203
Bashori, K. (2020). Integrasi nilai Islam dalam pendidikan modern. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1
Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12408
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Fullan, M. (2019). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Record, 121(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912100401
Hargreaves, A. (2020). Teacher collaboration and educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 21(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09366-1
Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning for teachers. Educational Leadership, 74(8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057417747111
Hidayat, R., & Patras, Y. E. (2019). Evaluasi sistem pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2019.81.45-60
Ismail, I. (2021). Humanistic learning theory in Islamic education. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1421a
Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2018). Linking leadership with student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(3), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18761325
Mulyasa, E. (2019). School-based management implementation. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33751/jmp.v7i2
Nasir, M. (2020). Islamic education and globalization challenges. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(5), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP
Noddings, N. (2018). The ethics of care in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(3), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017
Rahman, F. (2017). Islam and modernity. Journal of Islamic Studies, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0. Teachers College Record, 123(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300501
Sari, D. (2020). Pembelajaran humanistik dalam pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 27(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.30829/tar.v27i2
Schleicher, A. (2018). World-class education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org
Zubaedi. (2018). Desain pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 8(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v8i2
Artikel dalam prosiding:
Rahman, A., & Hidayat, T. (2020). Digital learning innovation in Islamic education. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education and Technology (pp. 45–50). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200321.010
Suryadi, D., & Mulyana, E. (2019). Student-centered learning in Islamic education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Education (pp. 120–130). https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icied-19
Disertasi:
Aziz, A. (2021). Konsep cinta dalam perspektif filsafat dan implikasinya terhadap pendidikan karakter. Disertasi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id
Hidayat, M. (2020). Konsep pendidikan humanistik dalam perspektif pendidikan Islam. Disertasi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga. http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id
Palmer, P. J. (2017). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. Disertasi. University of California. https://www.josseybass.com
Rahman, F. (2021). Nilai-nilai kasih sayang (rahmah) dalam pendidikan Islam dan implikasinya terhadap pembelajaran. Disertasi. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id
Sulaiman, A. (2019). Relasi guru dan peserta didik dalam pendidikan Islam perspektif etika Islam. Disertasi. Malang: Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id
