REPRESENTASI KOGNITIF LOTS, MOTS, DAN HOTS DALAM UJIAN MADRASAH AKIDAH AKHLAK: UPAYA PENJAMINAN MUTU AKADEMIK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v11i4.3088Keywords:
Taksonomi Bloom, Ujian Madrasah, Akidah Akhlak, HOTS, Penjaminan Mutu AkademikAbstract
This study aims to analyze and map the distribution of cognitive representation across Low Order Thinking Skills (LOTS), Middle Order Thinking Skills (MOTS), and High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) within the Akidah Akhlak Madrasah Examination (UM) instrument for the 2025/2026 academic year at MA Manba'ul Ulum Kabul. A descriptive quantitative approach utilizing the content analysis method was employed to dissect the master blueprint document and 45 examination items, comprising 40 multiple-choice questions and 5 essays. Data collection was conducted through documentation techniques, while the analysis utilized a codification sheet based on the revised Bloom's Taxonomy matrix. The findings revealed that the cognitive level distribution consisted of LOTS (Level 1) at 24.44% (11 items), MOTS (Level 2) as the dominant content at 53.33% (24 items), and HOTS (Level 3) at 22.22% (10 items). On a macro level, the construction of this evaluation instrument successfully meets the standardized ideal proportions and aligns with the curriculum mandate of KMA Number 183 of 2019. This research uncovers a research gap in the form of a minor discrepancy between the teacher's administrative documents (12 LOTS, 23 MOTS, 10 HOTS) and the researcher's objective verification results. This shift confirms the necessity of regular academic supervision by the madrasah headmaster and serves as a recommended model for school-level assessment quality assurance management.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Karthwohl, D. R. (2015). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen: Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom. Pustaka Pelajar. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1173822
Fathurrochman, I. (2021). Pengurusan Kurikulum Mutu Melalui Optimalisasi MGMP Tingkat Madrasah Aliyah. Jurnal Pedagogika, 5(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.29240/jpd.v5i1.2314
Fauzi, A., & Handayani, S. (2023). Pemetaan Peta Mutu Akademik Sekolah Menengah Atas Berbasis Standar Penilaian. Jurnal Administrasi Sekolah, 7(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.31940/jas.v7i1.3122
Kementerian Agama. (2019). Keputusan Menteri Agama (KMA) Nomor 183 Tahun 2019 tentang Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Bahasa Arab di Madrasah. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. https://subditkurikulum.kemenag.go.id/kma183/
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (Fourth Edition). SAGE. https://isbnsearch.org/isbn/9781506395661
Kurniawan, H. (2021). Validitas isi dan Reliabilitas Antar-Rater dalam Analisis Isi Instrumen Penilaian. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i1.34152
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed). Sage Publications. https://isbnsearch.org/isbn/9781452257808
Prasetyo, T., & Mahfud, M. (2021). Manajemen Kurikulum dan Supervisi Akademik dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v9i1.35412
Retnawati, H., & Saputra, A. (2020). Developing High Order Thinking Skills Assessment in School: Challenges and Opportunities for School Managers. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(5), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2019-0312
Samsudin, A., & Setiawan, B. (2022). Profesionalisme Guru PAI dalam Penyusunan Instrumen Evaluasi Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 10245–10258. https://doi.org/10.24036/jptam.v6i2.3841
Subali, B. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Evaluasi Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Ranah Kognitif. UNY Press. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1134291
Suryana, Y., & Rosdiana, D. (2022). Manajemen Kontrol Mutu Asesmen Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 6(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v6i2.45612
Wahyudi, A. (2020). Evaluasi Kinerja Sistem Penilaian Guru dalam Manajemen Mutu Sekolah. Jurnal Kepemimpinan & Pengurusan Sekolah, 4(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.34125/kp.v4i2.481
