AGILITAS MANAJEMEN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA DALAM MENINGKATKAN KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK GURU

Authors

  • Ade Tutty Rokhayati Rosa Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Erma Sulastyana Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Hesti Wihandini Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Neneng Puri Rachmawati Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Novan Novtiansyah Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v11i3.3098

Keywords:

HR Agility, Pedagogical Competence , Alpha Generation , Primary School, TPACK

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the role of Human Resource Management Agility (HR Agility) in improving teachers' pedagogical competence for addressing the learning characteristics of Generation Alpha students. Methods: A qualitative descriptive case study was conducted at SDN 036 Ujungberung, Bandung. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis involving the principal and six teachers. Data were analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña interactive model with source and technique triangulation. Results: The findings show that HR Agility is implemented through three dimensions: rapid identification of teachers' professional needs followed by responsive in-house training (speed), reverse mentoring and peer coaching within the Teacher Working Group to strengthen TPACK integration (flexibility), and continuous professional learning through the Platform Merdeka Mengajar (adaptability). These practices improve teachers' pedagogical competence despite budget limitations and technological resistance among a small number of senior teachers. Novelty: This study demonstrates that HR Agility functions as an agile school governance strategy integrating speed, flexibility, and adaptability to accelerate teachers' pedagogical competence in public primary schools.

References

Al-Kasasbeh, M. M., Al-Khawaldeh, K., & Al-Kasasbeh, O. (2020). The impact of human resource agility on organizational performance: The mediating role of organizational innovation. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(4), 112–125.

Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. Jossey-Bass.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.

Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital. Teachers College Press.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Platform Merdeka Mengajar. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 results (Volume II): Learning during and from disruption. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2023c). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Creative minds, creative schools. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2023d). PISA 2022 results (Volume V): Learning strategies and digital readiness. OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Rev. ed.). Doubleday.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report. UNESCO.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ziatdinov, R., & Cilliers, J. (2021). Generation Alpha: Conceptual insights and pedagogical implications for the future of education. Journal of Future Studies and Educational Technologies, 2(1), 15–28.

Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners. Corwin.

Zhao, Y. (2016). Never send a human to do a machine's job. Corwin.

Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

AGILITAS MANAJEMEN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA DALAM MENINGKATKAN KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK GURU. (2026). Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(3), 6557-6566. https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v11i3.3098