RECONSTRUCTING GREEN CURRICULUM IN INDONESIAN STATE ISLAMIC HIGHER EDUCATION (PTKIN): A MIZAN-BASED ECO-ISLAM FRAMEWORK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v11i5.3532Keywords:
Green Curriculum, State Islamic Higher Education, PTKIN, Eco-Islam, Mizan Framework.Abstract
The global ecological crisis reflects an epistemological and spiritual crisis in the human relationship with nature. In the context of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), Islamic State Religious Universities (PTKIN) have a strategic role in integrating Islamic values with environmental sustainability. However, the implementation of green curricula in PTKIN remains partial and lacks a comprehensive epistemological foundation. This study aims to reconstruct a green curriculum integration model based on the Grand Theory of Mizan at PTKIN. The study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, analyzing scholarly articles indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, and SINTA from 2016–2026. The findings show that tawhid, khalifah, amanah, the prohibition of fasad, and rahmatan lil ‘alamin can be developed as operational dimensions based on the principle of Mizan. This integration encompasses learning outcomes, curriculum structure, and academic culture. The study proposes the Mizan-Based Green Curriculum Framework as a model that connects Islamic ecotheology with the global sustainability agenda to foster graduates with ecological spirituality and environmental responsibility.
References
Azra, A. (2018). Integrasi ilmu dan pembaruan pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana. https://www.kencana.co.id
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. London: SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481
Cortese, A. D. (2003). The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 15–22. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ669055
Davim, J. P., & Leal Filho, W. (Eds.). (2020). Challenges for sustainability in higher education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44289-7
Dien, M. I. A. (2000). Environmental dimensions of Islam. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press. https://www.lutterworth.com
Fachruddin. (2021). Fikih lingkungan dan tantangan implementasinya di perguruan tinggi Islam. Jurnal Studi Islam, 18 (2)
IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406
Kamali, M. H. (2015). The Middle Path of Moderation in Islam. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele University. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
Khalid, F. (2019). Signs on the Earth: Islam, modernity and the climate crisis. Kube Publishing. https://kubepublishing.com
Lynham, S. A. (2002). The general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422302043002
Mangunjaya, F. M. (2019). Konservasi alam dalam Islam. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. https://obor.or.id
Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the order of nature. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com
Nasr, S. H. (2020). Man and nature: The spiritual crisis of modern man. Kazi Publications. https://kazi.com
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, Article 43, 879–910. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03743
Özdemir, İ. (2003). Toward an understanding of environmental ethics from a Qur'anic perspective. Islamic Studies, 42(1), 1–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20837325
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
Rohman, A., et al. (2024). Religious Education for the Environment: Integrating Eco-Theology in the Curriculum of Islamic Religious and Character Education to Enhance Environmental Education in Indonesia. Nadwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. https://doi.org/10.21580/nw.2024.18.2.21094
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sterling, S. (2021). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change (2nd ed.). Green Books. https://www.greenbooks.co.uk
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
UNESCO. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
