VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS ON THE QURAN AND HADITH IN THE SUBJECTS OF DA'WAH, KHUTBAH, AND TABLIG FOR GRADE XI AT MAN 1 MANDAILING NATAL

Authors

  • Febriansyah Siregar Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal, Indonesia
  • Sri Wahyuni Khairani Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal, Indonesia
  • Syamsiah Depalina Siregar Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34125/jkps.v11i3.2626

Keywords:

Validitas, Keandalan, Tingkat Kesulitan, Indeks Diskriminasi, Evaluasi Pembelajaran

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discriminatory power of multiple-choice questions on the material of Da'wah, Sermons, and Tablig for class XI at MAN 1 Mandailing Natal in the 2025/2026 academic year. The type of research used is descriptive quantitative, with 20 class XI students as subjects. Data were collected through a learning outcome test instrument, which was then analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Validity analysis was carried out using the Pearson Product Moment correlation formula, while reliability was calculated using the Cronbach Alpha formula. The results showed that out of 10 questions, there were 7 valid questions and 3 invalid questions. The reliability value (R₁₁) showed a very high level of consistency, so the instrument can be categorized as reliable. Analysis of the level of difficulty showed 30% of the questions were easy, 50% were moderate, and 20% were difficult, while the discriminatory power analysis showed 60% of the questions were categorized as good, 10% were sufficient, and 30% were poor. Overall, the test instrument is considered to be of good quality and suitable for use as an evaluation tool for Islamic Religious Education learning, although several items need to be revised to achieve more optimal construct suitability

References

Alfani, N. (2022). Analysis of Summative Tests in Secondary School Mathematics Learning. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 14(2), 45–58.

Anderson, L. W. (2019). Assessment in Education: Principles and Applications. New York: Routledge.

Arikunto, S. (2018). Research Procedures: A Practical Approach (7th Revised Edition, pp. 120–121). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2018). Research Procedures: A Practical Approach (Revised Edition, pp. 120–121). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Astuti, R. (2018). Analysis of Multiple Choice Items in Learning Evaluation. Journal of Educational Research, 35(1), 23–31.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1-5063-8670-6.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2015). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New York: Cengage Learning.

Fauziyyah, N. (2019). The relationship between measurement, assessment, and evaluation in education: A theoretical study. Scientific Journal of Education and Learning, 3(1), 45–53.

Fitriani, N., Sari, L., & Prasetyo, A. (2019). Analysis of final semester exam questions for Islamic Religious Education in senior high school. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 10(1), 45–56.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2018). Reliability analysis. In IBM SPSS Statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (pp. 241–255). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033909-25

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2018). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A

Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and Validating Test Items. New York: Routledge.

Hanum, F., Muliono, T. P. R. Z., & Safira, F. (2025). Development of a test instrument for creative thinking skills in preaching material for high school students. Relativitas Journal: Innovation in Aqidah Learning, 7(1), 45–54. Malikussaleh University.

Hayati, S. (2016). The influence of instrument validity and reliability on educational research results. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(1), 55–63.

Ida, I., & Musyarofah, M. (2021). Analysis of the quality of multiple-choice questions as an effort to improve learning evaluation instruments. Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 11(1), 34–42.

Livingston, S. A., Carlson, J., & Bridgeman, B. (2018). Test reliability: Basic concepts. ETS Research Memorandum, RM-18-01, 1–12. Educational Testing Service (ETS).

Lubis, W. A. (2024). Pengembangan E-Komik melalui Flipbuilder untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Peserta Didik pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kebudayaan Islam [Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal]. https://repository.stain-madina.ac.id/id/eprint/212

Lubis, W. A. (2026). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Gamifikasi Berbasis Quizizz untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik. An-Nuha, 6(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/annuha.v6i1.745

Mardapi, D. (2008). Techniques for Developing Test and Non-Test Instruments. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia Press.

Mudiyntri, N. S., & Indriani, N. S. (2025). Testing the quality of financial professional ethics questions as a learning evaluation tool for grade XI through the Anates version 4.0 test. Journal of Economic Education, 10(2).

Mueller, R. O., & Knapp, T. R. (2018). Reliability and validity. In Quantitative research methods for professionals (pp. 423–438). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755649-29

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational Assessment of Students (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Novia, A., Susanti, R., & Wibowo, D. (2020). Analysis of Multiple Choice Question Quality in Terms of Validity and Reliability. Journal of Learning Evaluation, 8(2), 112–121.

Novia, R., Putri, A. N., & Fitria, D. (2020). Validity and reliability of multiple-choice questions in religious education. Journal of Islamic Education and Teaching, 8(2), 120–130.

Plonsky, L., & Derrick, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research. Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 713–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12335

Popham, W. J. (2017). Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Quaigrain, K., & Arhin, A. K. (2017). Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a teacher-developed test in educational measurement and evaluation. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1301013. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301013

Quintão, C., Andrade, P., & Almeida, F. (2020). How to improve the validity and reliability of a case study approach? Journal of International Students in Education, 10(3), 45–60.

Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2019). Reliability from α to ω: A tutorial. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1395–1411. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000754

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2020). Application of the Rasch model for social science research (revised edition). Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Suryani, L., & Nasir, A. (2024). Analysis of Islamic Education learning outcome test items based on discriminating power and difficulty level. Journal of Islamic Education

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validitas dan reliabilitas alat penelitian: Cara menguji validitas kuesioner/survei dalam penelitian. Jurnal Penelitian Akademik dalam Manajemen, 5(3), 28–36.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-21

How to Cite

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS ON THE QURAN AND HADITH IN THE SUBJECTS OF DA’WAH, KHUTBAH, AND TABLIG FOR GRADE XI AT MAN 1 MANDAILING NATAL. (2026). Jurnal Kepemimpinan Dan Pengurusan Sekolah, 11(3), 2026-2036. https://doi.org/10.34125/jkps.v11i3.2626