"PELAKSANAAN SUPERVISI KOLEGIAL BERBASIS PENDEKATAN DEVELOPMENTAL DALAM MENINGKATKAN KOMPETENSI PENGAJARAN GURU DI SMAN 15 PADANG"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34125/jkps.v11i3.2293Keywords:
Supervisi Kolegial; Pendekatan Developmental; Kompetensi Pengajaran; Supervisi Teman SejawatAbstract
Teacher professional competence constitutes a fundamental determinant of instructional quality across all phases of learning—from planning and implementation to evaluation. Collegial supervision rooted in a developmental framework presents a contextually grounded and democratic avenue for advancing teacher professionalism. This study investigated the implementation of developmental-based collegial supervision at SMAN 15 Padang, examining its effects on instructional competence and identifying the factors that either facilitate or constrain its execution. A qualitative approach employing a case study design was adopted. Data were gathered through participatory observation, in-depth semi-structured interviews, and document review, subsequently validated using source and technique triangulation. Analysis followed the interactive model proposed by Miles, Huberman, and Saldana (2014). Findings reveal that collegial supervision was carried out through five systematic stages: peer pairing formation, professional development mapping, technical preparation, a three-phase observation cycle, and documentation of outcomes. The collaborative approach emerged as the most frequently applied. Positive outcomes included enhanced pedagogical competence, the cultivation of professional reflection habits, encouragement of instructional innovation, and the establishment of a professional learning community. Enablers included transformational school leadership, a collegial institutional climate, and structural support systems; constraints encompassed cultural resistance among some teachers, limited constructive feedback skills, and excessive workload.
References
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Belajar.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2007). Supervision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Lovell, J. T., & Wiles, K. (1983). Supervision for Better Schools (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi (36th ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muslim, S. B. (2009). Supervisi Pendidikan Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru. Alfabeta.
Reinhartz, J., & Beach, D. M. (2004). Educational Leadership: Changing Schools, Changing Roles. Pearson.
Rifma. (2013). Problematika kompetensi pedagogik guru. Jurnal Pedagogik, XIII(1).
Rifma. (2016). Optimalisasi Pembinaan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru. Kencana.
Rifma. (2017). Analisis model layanan supervisi berbasis kategori guru. Laporan Penelitian. Universitas Negeri Padang.
Rifma. (2019). Content layanan supervisi berbasis kategori guru. Laporan Penelitian. Universitas Negeri Padang.
Rifma. (2022). Pemetaan kemampuan dasar guru tingkat dasar dan menengah. Laporan Penelitian. Universitas Negeri Padang.
Rifma. (2024). Analisis variabilitas kemampuan dasar guru. Laporan Penelitian. Universitas Negeri Padang.
Rifma. (2025). Peningkatan inovasi pembelajaran melalui supervisi profesional berbasis kemampuan dasar guru. Laporan Penelitian. Universitas Negeri Padang.
Suhardan, D. (2010). Supervisi Profesional. Alfabeta.
Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.












