THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTRONIC FEEDBACK USING MICROSOFT WORD IN TEACHING ENGLISH WRITING

Authors

  • Salsabila Salsabila STAIN Mandailing Natal, Indonesia
  • Amrizal Amrizal STAIN Mandailing Natal, Indonesia
  • Restina Liza STAIN Mandailing Natal, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ridwan Gozali STAIN Mandailing Natal, Indonesia
  • Zulaikha Zahara STAIN Mandailing Natal, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34125/jkps.v11i5.2939

Keywords:

Umpan Balik Elektronik, Microsoft Word, Menulis Bahasa Inggris, EFL, Kuasi-Eksperimen

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of electronic feedback (e-feedback) delivered through Microsoft Word in enhancing English writing skills among university students. Employing a quasi-experimental design with pre-test and post-test control group, the research involved 20 fourth-semester students at STAIN Mandailing Natal, divided equally into an experimental group receiving e-feedback via Microsoft Word's Track Changes and Comment features, and a control group receiving conventional written feedback. Data were gathered through writing tests, questionnaires, and documentation. Statistical analysis using paired t-tests and independent samples t-tests revealed that the experimental group achieved significantly higher post-test scores (M = 81.40) compared to the control group (M = 71.20), with a significance value of p = 0.003 (< 0.05). Furthermore, student questionnaire responses indicated highly positive perceptions toward e-feedback in terms of clarity, accessibility, and motivational value. These findings affirm that electronic feedback through Microsoft Word constitutes a substantially more effective instructional strategy in teaching English writing than traditional paper-based feedback approaches.

References

Abrams, Z. I. (2021). Responsive peer feedback, collaborative revision, and learner engagement. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100814

Al-Rashidi, A. H. (2023). Saudi EFL learners' perceptions of written corrective feedback in digital environments. Teaching English with Technology, 23(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.12187/tet23.1.1

Annamalai, N. (2022). Exploring teachers' feedback practices for writing activities using Microsoft Word and its impact on writing quality. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15229a

Bonanomi, A., Ruscio, E., & Osmetti, S. A. (2022). Effectiveness of electronic feedback in the EFL classroom: A systematic review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(4), 712–723. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1304.02

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book255675

Ferris, D. R. (2023). Treatment of error in second language student writing (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12682

Fithriani, R., Rafida, T., & Siahaan, A. M. (2021). Written corrective feedback and student writing development: Comparing electronic and handwritten feedback in Indonesian EFL context. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 16(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v16i1.2346

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2022). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2021). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (Eds.). (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547

Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2021). Nature of and factors leading to mismatches between students' responses to and teachers' intentions of written feedback on writing. Asian EFL Journal, 23(6), 159–192. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/index.php/aej/article/view/1946

Mubarak, H., Asri, A. H., & Ramli, N. (2023). Learner autonomy and e-feedback in EFL academic writing: Evidence from Malaysian universities. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i1.21584

Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Writing task complexity, students' motivational beliefs, and use of feedback in English academic writing. Journal of Writing Research, 14(1), 73–116. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2022.14.01.04

Séror, J. (2021). Show me! Enhanced feedback through screencasting technology. TESL Canada Journal, 38(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v38i2.1353

Weigle, S. C. (2022). Assessing writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009010702

Yusuf, Q., Jusoh, Z., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2022). Cooperative learning strategies to enhance writing skills among second language learners. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 1159–1172. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14167a

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTRONIC FEEDBACK USING MICROSOFT WORD IN TEACHING ENGLISH WRITING. (2026). Jurnal Kepemimpinan Dan Pengurusan Sekolah, 11(5), 3825-3834. https://doi.org/10.34125/jkps.v11i5.2939